You can run the same simulation millions of times, and the chances are you’ll never see exactly the same combination again. Confirming the fallacyĬonsider running a simulation over 37 spins on European wheel. His critical mistake is thinking a pattern in his mind is not necessarily a pattern in reality. But what the system designer doesn’t understand that any combination of 37 spins is just as likely as another. Basically he means you will never have every number spin once each in 37 spins cycle.īasically he’s saying in 27 spins, you’ll never see this: His reasoning for this is because if you consider 37 spins on the European wheel, you will never see 37 independent numbers. The system designer claims his system is absolutely guaranteed to win. It is by no means a new fallacy, but it’s one of them circulating on forums. Here I will explain the latest gambling fallacy I read on a gambling forum. The best way of playing roulette is actually rather logical and simple, but I’ll explain more about it later.

It seems the matter how much I try to explain the basics of any gambling game, the majority of players don’t understand why a system will lose. If a system does not win with flat bets, it will not win with betting progression such as the Martingale. This is gambling in every sense of the word. Firstly, you might win big and end up profiting for the day. This website extensively explains why such approaches lose, and specifically which approach is the best way to play roulette.Īs you become a more experienced player, you may begin to understand that changing the size of your bets has two possible outcomes. Probably the most common is the Martingale, which is basically doubling bet size after losses. Most new roulette players begin with much the same roulette systems and strategies.

Best way to play roulette to win